Written from the perspective of a researcher; what they failed to consider, their biases, and the colonization of time into imperial time.
Written from the perspective of a researcher; what they failed to consider, their biases, and the colonization of time into imperial time.
This thing is sooooooo far up its own ass, holy shit. Also, the authors need to do some self-crit on writing accessibly and coherently if they’re going to pick nits like this. This reads like an undergrad extended essay where you get points for long-winded analogies and pointless name-dropping.
okay but uh, have you considered that your values of clear writing and epistemological neutrality, are, in fact contingent and historical. if you were a better person, you’d realize that your assumptions are colonized and imperial, and that this is a very good and incisive article, actually.