reading the list of ideologies “harmful to the global south” and comparing it to the ideologies that the global south has tried and gotten results from and drawing no conclusions

  • glans [it/its]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    how is “post civ” very cool but “anarcho primitivism” no bueno?

    aren’t they the same thing?

    edit: and "anti civ"is in the aite row.

    • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      “some people on twitter said that anarcho primitivism is based, but some other people said it’s equivalent to fascism. i cannot be bothered to find out what their arguments actually were, and i have never actually read any critiques of civilization because my interest in the topic extends to finding a new polandball guy to draw, so i’ll uncritically download and repeat both opinions as my own.”

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      anti/post “civ” is a different critique from the primitivist one, its not about technology but like the ideological/cultural construction of “civilisation” and its opposite “uncivilized”.

      i’ve read some okay takes on it, but its not like a full political programme. not that that stops these reddit idiots trying to invent tendencies, lol