• interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think owners should have a say in the content of the discussion. That is something for users and moderators to decide. I have had enough of the “take my ball and go home” situations. Make the database an encrypted blob that cannot be inspected directly.

    Alternatively, there is no reason for instances to exist anyway. All computer users have orders of magnitude more compute power to each run their own single user instance. On their five year old phone and even in the dishwasher.

    Text is small. Being a hard drive owner would not grant leverage over the freedom of expression of others.

    Lemmy is not distributed enough, there is still too much power concentrated in the hands of the owner class and the moderator class.

    Users should be their own owners. Moderators will still be needed but they will only operate with the consent of each user to mask off the content they don’t want to see.

    • TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.page
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You want me to host a community on my phone but only some stranger is allowed to curate the content on it? I don’t really understand this system you’re describing.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any lemmeyverse user, including you, would be allowed to emit an opinion regarding moderation actions that would be performed on it.

        In the same way votes are currently emitted, moderation actions should be “emitted” and every user can decide to follow, or override or have any kind of rule to interpret those actions.

        For instance, a rule could be, if 100 users have emitted “delete” then enact this action in my locally filtered view.