• DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Bernie believes in the eradication of capitalism, he’s a socialist working in a fucked over Overton window that means the best policies he can argue for would fall under social democracy at best.

      Which, to be very clear, makes him a raging commie by American political standards.

      The only people who argue he’s a capitalist are people that think socialism is when poor.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          He specifically describes himself as a democratic socialist instead of a social democrat but I also haven’t read the book so feel free to quote an excerpt from it saying he thinks the capitalist model is the only viable one.

        • Iceblade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          As a Swede, what he’s been advocating for doesn’t sound like the nordic model to me.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      Liberalism actually has a lot of definitions. It is a classical philosophical concept, a modern political philosophical concept, a term to describe a lower value of risk aversion, a term to mean supplied in abundance, and (here) a political science term used to describe an entire half of a relative political spectrum whose center point is determined by the specific body politic being measured. So, big shooter, no you are mistaken at a very basic level. All nations have both a liberal and conservative spectrum within their own political system. And, just to raise your level of education on the subject, you know what? Even within those subgroups, there is a liberal and conservative divide based on the relative ideology of the subgroup. And fun fact, you can yet still divide those subgroups of subgroups — this is a large part of how the phenomenon of group polarization happens.