• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would have thought the license agreement would be one of the least expensive parts of making modern high-performance chips.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Quite the opposite. Well, sort of.

      It’s easy to get a licence, you just need money. Lots of money.

      That’s if you can get a licence. Intel only licensed to AMD because the USA military requires two vendors.

      ARM charges an, err, arm and a leg.

      • Bene7rddso@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Intel licensed to Cyrix (now VIA) as well, and it wasn’t the military but IBM that wanted more suppliers

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh yeah, I even had a VIA! What happen to them?

          That was all from unreliable memory. TY for the error correction.

    • andruid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tbh the biggest saving from this that I’ve actually heard was time saving some 6 months or even potentially saving legal costs during development. Which for a budget starting closer to nothing,like academics, open source, or early start ups, any cost is barrier.

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s actually very lucrative scheme. For example, you’ll need to get some licenses to some Qualcomm patents before you can even buy their Snapdragon chips.

    • apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you have the order volume, enough capital to book fab capacity and a solid margin, kind of. These agreements are often done in cents per chip with minimum volume amounts, this is why you see most complicated ARM SoCs targeted at the smartphone market first and trickle down into lower margin products later.

      This is the consequences of only being able to get your licence from one vendor.