What a fucking grifter!

  • j prole@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know. He misworded it. It wasn’t banned because it was never the law in the first place.

    • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Granted, that is essentially a de facto ban. Exclusion by omission serves the exact same purpose as a ban, even if the semantics are different.

      • ImOnADiet (He/Him)@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think the difference here is that hinkle is making it sound like it was legal and then China turned around and banned it, it makes it seem like they’re going backwards in progress instead of forwards