• activistPnk@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It would be a lot more environmentally effective to convince people to reduce beef consumption and replace it with chicken/pork instead,

    Let’s not drive a wedge between the eco-vegans and the animal welfare vegans. Beef is the worst for climate while chickens get the least ethical treatment.

    This duplicity muddies the waters and makes getting real actual change that would benefit the climate harder to achieve and less likely to happen.

    Dividing an already tiny population of much needed activists is not how you get progressive change. Non-beef meats still shadow plant-based food in terms of their climate harm.

    Your pic was too big for me to download but if it’s the same data I’ve seen, then beef is the worst and lamb is 2nd at about ½ the emissions of beef, and all the meats are substantially more harmful than plant based options.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Honestly this whole argument reminds me of the importance of intersectionality. Yes different groups have different forms, levels and styles of oppression, but there is still a joint cause for dismantling oppression as a whole.