• dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The horrible reality is that Bing has actually become a competitor to Google, simply by Google getting worse and worse. Microsoft used to be the main bad guy, but these days they practically seem benign compared to the others. Not open source like you’re saying, of course.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The infrastructure to crawl, store, and serve search results to billions of users is phenomenally expensive. A government might fund it (which comes with its own concerns), but a non-profit will struggle to compete.

    • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wikipedia probably has the resources to do it, wikisearch. Somebody talk them into it. But yeah, modern search engines, pretty amazing the ones from two decades ago actually worked better.

    • Chocrates@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This could be interesting. The infrastructure required to scrape the internet though is going to be so daunting. Google got to build it up slowly as the internet got bigger. Bing is backed by a huge corporation that already has data centers. A new non profit player is going to take a huge coordinated effort.

      • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know P2P had become a dead buzzword, but what if people dedicated a portion of their computers to assisting an open search engine.

        I would wait 30s for accurate results. It could also piggyback on a search aggregator.