Rank-and-file members of both the House and Senate are paid $174,000 a year.

That probably seems like a decent amount of money, and it is: The median household income in 2022 was $74,580, according to the US Census.

But consider that members of Congress generally have to maintain two residences — one in Washington, DC, and one in their home state — and that they haven’t gotten a raise since 2009.

Inflation, meanwhile, has eaten away at the value of that salary over time: If lawmakers’ salaries had kept pace with inflation, they would be paid over $250,000 today.

Rep. Patrick McHenry, a North Carolina Republican who served as the interim speaker of the House following Kevin McCarthy’s ouster, told The Dispatch that congressional pay needed to be raised in order to attract “credible people to run for office.”

  • jonne
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    They should make the salary a multiple of the federal minimum wage.

    • chingadera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Fuck that, make it directly proportional to what the average american is able to put in their savings account. You do not get to be paid by me to profit if I am not also doing so.

      Why the fuck are we all sitting here sympathizing with these fucking animals we have in Congress right now? They have not done anything to help you since they’ve been in office. If you’re going to give us breadcrumbs, you also get bread crumbs. I’m shocked at the way people are thinking about this.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, I think there’s a point to be made here

        100k isn’t a lot in DC, and they’re going to be traveling back and forth a lot. It’s a high salary, but it’s middle class level when you add in the second rent and the expenses related to the job

        Do you want your politicians to be worried about their financial situation? Or already be wealthy? That seems like a recipe for the kind of legalized bribery we have going on

        It also means that power is the only draw for people to that position.

        There’s not a lot of security there, what do you do if you lose? You’ve now got two rents, maybe even two mortgages and a family, and the only job that is going to pay on that scale with those qualifications is something I don’t want to exist, like being a lobbyist or working for a PAC

        • chingadera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Until laws are passed that limit stock trades/lobbying payments, I have no sympathy for their money.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            To be clear, most all of them can go fuck themselves. I don’t really care about any of their financial states, and I absolutely support limiting their ability to make money off the office… It’s also a few million dollars a year we’re talking about, it’s a very cheap way to make things better

            What I care about are incentives and selection pressures. I want normal people with morals and idealistic people in those seats. I don’t want rich people raised to crave approval from their peers, or people with dreams of climbing higher.

            I want the job to be the end goal, not a stepping stone to another end