I run a full media server, as well do a few friends. Now we had the idea to share our media libraries. In a first quick attempt we, mounted each other’s library folder via an smb share and imported those in jellyfin (all servers connected by VPN) Works quite well, but is kind of cumbersome the more people get in. I had the following idea: distributed storage, not as in redundancy, but more like mergerfs. Each “node” allocates a certain amount of storage, say node A, B and C provide 1TB each, these get fused into a singe mount that shows up as 3TB volume. If one node goes offline, the volume will only be 2TB and all files on the offline node will of course be unavailable.

Did a bit of research and found stuff like ceph,.glusterfs or seeweedfs, all of which I guess have a lot more functionality and thus are quite complicated and a little over my head. Do you do something like that or have any good ideas how to do that easily?

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    plex uses a centralized service for this kinda of nonsense. most of us are using standalone server products.

    this use case calls for either centralized storage (s3 bucket) or access mechanism(all them vpns) to distributed channels (ala plex)… but friends dont let friends use plex.

    im curious about ipfs as distributed file systems sound like a new kink i should have

    • density@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      tell me why i shouldn’t use plex as I’m always tempted by it whenever these threads come up and everyone who uses it is so happy.

      But free/libre is so much more delicious.

      But don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.