• JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    No one is saying it’s not. Your statement’s implication is that because follow up costs are so low that the upfront is negligable, but that’s fallacious as it’s still significant and potentially out of reach for someone that wasn’t planning on spending as much as a car upfront.

    • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Your statement’s implication is …

      I’m gonna say the same thing after my cat wakes up:

      “Ooooo big stretch.”

        • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          In this case, when I wrote “You got all of that”, my statement’s implication was that I read your whole comment.

          Having a hard time comprehending any comments? Maybe I should type slower for you.