• lemming934@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I guess this is a situation where the proper name of GNU / Linux is useful

    Edit: Chrome OS is is a GNU/ Linux and a couple of “proper” Linuxes are not.

    • Phrodo_00@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      As far as I know, ChromeOS is also GNU/Linux (It uses full glibc, includes gnu utils and bash), so not so much.

      • NaN@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They mention this in the article.

        In fact, they never say it’s not Linux. The summary would be more like: “ChromeOS should be counted among desktop Linux, because it has the same basis as any other GNU/Linux distribution, unlike Android. Here are the dumb reasons I think people would argue against this.”

      • fulano@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Such definitions are becoming more and more complicated. I think we should standardize a name for the family of systems we use, or it will become uglier and uglier.

        Recently, I had to write an academic work in the area, and an entire section was dedicated to explaining this controversy and defining what kind of system I was talking about, so that the work is reproducible.