• cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t like to refer to military initiatives of the USSR to be invasions. I think it cedes ground to capitalists and falsely equivocates. The correct term is liberate.

    • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Its still an invasion by definition. What the intentions of the assaulting army are don’t matter in regard to whether a military undertaking is an invasion or not.

      We can’t just pick and choose good sounding names and assume that changes reality, or that by adhering to a definition that that somehow cedes ground.

      Invasion: A military offensive in which large numbers of combatants of one geopolitical entity enter territory owned by another such entity, generally with the objective of either: conquering; liberating or re-establishing control or authority over a territory, forcing the partition of a country; altering the established government or gaining concessions from said government; or a combination thereof.

        • ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I understand, but we reach a point where that is simply not our problem anymore. We cannot try and make every little detail adhere to their worldview.

          If they make the equivalence, then so be it.