• CatratchoPalestino [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    the countries don’t exactly deliver press releases saying what imperialism is usually they just say “down with yankee imperialism”. do you want something like a curriculum on how the subject is taught in school? how these countries actually act?

    • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well you said they dont world systems theory so i assumed you had evidence of that. Saying “down with yankee imperialism” is hardly contradictory. They might not literally read Wallerstein but if youre going to deny his development of theory and its applicability to modern conditions (that Marx and Lenin never observed) based on what you think the DPRK and Cuba think about it i would assume youd have something more solid.

      Che said that the United States is the belly of the beast. That certainly seems in line.

      • CatratchoPalestino [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        the onus is not on my proving they don’t follow some esoteric sociological theory of a foreign professor but on you to prove that they do. and no che using poetic license is not proof of a communist country following a hundreds of page long dissertation. next you’ll say iran follows it too since it says israel little satan and america big satan

        • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          11 months ago

          I literally said that they may not read Wallerstein. The point is that the broad strokes are not contradictory to the concept of an imperial core existing. I was looking for ideas that actually materially contradict here. Honestly, i dont think you need to follow all of Wallerstein to use the term imperial core. If its useful for describing the current geopolitical situation, which i think it is, then its useful.

          Honestly this all just seems like a nitpick to throw me off base. None of it contradicts my core points.

          • CatratchoPalestino [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            marxism isn’t about what feels useful and isn’t about what’s geopolitically common sense from your perspective. if you oppose communists overthrowing the government in my country and support the demsocs who want to continue capitalist relations and exploitation I don’t consider you a comrade in the same struggle, to put it as simply as possible