• Aldehyde@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because of how thin the modern screens are nowadays. Iirc, the logo would shine through and make a bright spot on the screen if made on modern macs.

          • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            My iBook G4 just used the screen backlight for the logo. It was kinda dim compared to my 09 Macbook but it still lit up.

            Though I guess ambient light might be an issue as someone mentioned.

          • Red@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yep!
            Some of my old Macs had LCD fading right in the middle where the logo was. Was Hella annoying

      • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Wait for real? They killed the logo light? Never giving up this 2012 mbp I guess.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yeah, the newer displays are just too thin for it. The backlit design was clever at the time, with the logo being illuminated by the display’s own backlight, but now at current thickness levels, it would cause ambient light to shine through the logo and back onto the display too noticeably.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Guessing that the uni in question has a deal with apple - teaching at a uni with a Lenovo deal, most lectures look exactly like this but with a different logo on the laptops

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    As a windows user, switching to a Mac for software development… I absolutely get it.

    As a Linux user, using a mac is for software development… Kinda unnecessary overhead.

    • krippix@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why would you need a mac for software development? For Swift?

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, it’s weird that people say that when visual studio 20XX is windows only and the most popular IDE (IIRC).

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I used to be a pure Win dev and used Docker, and so did half of my in-person team. And when we had windows issues, it was always this weird edge-case of “oh, this is only happening on Dave’s comp. Or Sarah’s. Or Steve’s.” Even on the same computer brands.

        Then pandemic happened, and my company gave everyone Macs to work remotely. And my dept tripled and troubleshooting remotely sucks ass. But these Macs, it was all the same. Dealing with tech issues took an hour vs the whole day. And people spent more time coding than fighting their OS.

        On windows, You can absolutely use WSL and all these other work around, but I kept having to fight Windows to do something. Drivers. Or permissions. Or some weird ass setting. But on Macs, troubleshooting and problem solving was way easier. Weird to say, but Apple just gets out of your way.

        In terms of “I’m just trying to code”, as a Windows user for over 25 years, holy shit Mac just works right out of the box.

        And once Linux/proton is more mature, I really can’t see using Windows at all.

    • GhostsAreShitty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Linux on my personal computers for sure. Work? Mac all day. I can install required software and I don’t need some janky Windows terminal emulator. It’s hard to justify Windows for anything besides gaming, and even that is questionable with Linux gaming distros now.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        You don’t even need a gaming distro. You just need to install Steam and (for other games) Bottles and you’re pretty much good to go.