As asked

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    That humans are actually the rational beings many claim themselves to be, rather than animals that makes decisions based on emotion and then rationalise why they made the decision.

    I feel it would solve all the problems other commenters have mentioned.

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Pretty much.

        The co2 we are emitting into the atmosphere is leading to problems.

        Rational response: reduce our co2 emissions as fast as possible.

        Our constant population expansion and habitat destruction is causing a new mass extension event:

        Rational response: Limit population growth. reduce environmental impact and regenerate damage already done.

        Etc

        etc

        etc.

  • Clangbang@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    That no matter what scientists and engineers try, when combusting fossil fuel, the exhaust smells like a terrible latrine.

    I think that would spur a quick response from everyday citizens as to what they heat their homes with, or how they get around their cities.

    • WHARRGARBL@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I like the direction of this thought. I’ve imagined the same, until I remembered that before fossil fuels, humans used whale oil for lamps, lubricants, soaps, etc, and cut down trees for heat.

      This is one of those “be careful what you wish for” scenarios. 8 billion people burning trees for heat and killing whales for lighting creates a whole new hellscape.

      • Nepenthe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Ideally, global warming, but it would be fair to view that as pointless when dissipating the extra CO2 doesn’t necessarily return the trees and the problem would degrade again in a couple hundred years. You’d have to introduce a new fuel source that is sought after, clean, and eternal. Which would be two wishes.

        So you have to define it as both of your options, since the loss of either worsens the other. Turn the whole environment back to where it was in the 1200s, overrun the streets with bears, see if I care. It’ll give 'em something to do. Especially the Amazonian avocado farmers.

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    Probanly erradicate akrasia. A lot of the world’s problems are down to rampant akrasia on the part of most people.

  • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Have all Meta, Microsoft, Amazon and Google servers go up in smoke and watch the world realize how much we depend on these four fuckwits