LCP@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoEpic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1328arrow-down112file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldprivacy@lemmy.mltechnology@hexbear.netandroid@kbin.socialantitrust@lemmy.mltechnology@kbin.socialhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1316arrow-down1external-linkEpic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightwww.theverge.comLCP@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square43fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldprivacy@lemmy.mltechnology@hexbear.netandroid@kbin.socialantitrust@lemmy.mltechnology@kbin.socialhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.foo
Google will appeal the decision: https://www.theverge.com/2023/12/11/23996902/google-will-appeal-the-epic-v-google-verdict
minus-squareLibreFish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·11 months agoThey force anybody using the android trademark to include Google Play/Services, not a lawyer but I think that’s “tying” when they force you to use one thing with something else. And juries are unpredictable.
They force anybody using the android trademark to include Google Play/Services, not a lawyer but I think that’s “tying” when they force you to use one thing with something else.
And juries are unpredictable.