• Dmian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Agreed. But that’s not my point. My point is that it can be done.

    And in some cases, even if it’s less than ideal, and is way more cumbersome than using a CLI, you are helping non-tech-savvy people do things they couldn’t do any other way.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nobody capable of defining an algorithm in a visual flowchart like that isn’t also capable of doing it in a CLI (or at least, in text in general – writing a script). It’s thinking through what you want to happen that’s the hard part; expressing it in the UI is trivial in comparison.

      • Dmian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Some people have problems remembering commands, for example. And it’s easier for them if they can see it.

        Yes, you can teach a kid to program (with some effort), but there’s a reason why Scratch presents logic units with shapes and colors and a GUI.

        There are many reasons why a visual representation may be easier to grasp than just resorting to memory and remembering abstract concepts.

        I mean, do you remember everything that you write? You’ve never had to visit Stack Overflow to remember how to do something, because you forgot the exact syntax of an operation? Now, how about if I put things visually in front of you? What would be easier?

        • howrar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’ve probably spent more time looking up how to access specific functions in a GUI than for CLI.