Are you a bot?
www.raillynews.com

USA Will Invest in High-Speed ​​Train to Fight Climate Change::The USA Will Invest in High-Speed ​​Train to Fight Climate Change - US President Joe Biden announced in a speech on December 9, 2023 that they are carrying out the first high-speed train projects in US history. These projects are across America

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.worldEnglish
    555·
    11 months ago

    These projects are part of an $10 billion investment

    California’s HSR system come in at $80 billion for 520 miles, or $154 million per mile. Amtrak estimates that it would cost $500 million per mile to turn its Northeast Corridor route into a true high-speed system. source

    For $10 billion, we are talking an additional 20 to 65 miles of high speed rail to be built. This is basically nothing…

    • ExLisper@linux.communityEnglish
      531·
      11 months ago

      The worst part is that it usually follows well known cycle of:

      • project is estimated at $10b, government assigns $10b
      • private companies spend it on consultants and analysis, little gets built
      • government agrees to invest another $5b but requires cuts to the initial scope
      • with reduced scope projected passengers numbers drop, project is less attractive
      • repeat until cost is 1000% of the initial estimate and usefulness is 0. cancel project
    • qooqie@lemmy.worldEnglish
      61·
      11 months ago

      Drop in the bucket, I’m curious how much it would take to make most of the US/NA traversable by high speed rail

      • AA5B@lemmy.worldEnglish
        7·
        11 months ago

        Depends on what you mean by most.

        • most of the population is quite achievable. Send a little time at https://www.ushsr.com/
        • most of the geography, trillions, and we couldn’t afford to keep it operating

        I really think that confusing this is a common mistake. People claim high speed rail is impossible in the US because we’re big (and ignoring China, eu), but we have plenty of cities, and most of them are clustered. High speed rail is great for cities within a few hundred miles of each other. We got those, and that’s most of the population

        It’s specious to take scenarios high speed rail doesn’t do well at and claiming that it means it can’t work. Let’s apply a little intelligence here’d and use the right technology for the right scenario

    • dezmd@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      11 months ago

      Jacksonville FL to Mobile AL is not included even though old rail and established railway right of way is already in place. Its an incomplete plan out of the gate before even looking at the realities of the funding equating to near goddamn nothing. We need real Trillion dollar funding plans at this point for high speed rail on a national level, use the long range east west/north south interstate cooridors to build over/under to connect coasts and Mexico to Canada on 4 or 5 major lines each.

    • sic_semper_tyrannis@feddit.chEnglish
      49·
      11 months ago

      Think if we instead of giving trillions of dollars to the Ukraine, spent it on our own country. If we spent all that money on this project alone it might actually be beneficial to our people

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.worldEnglish
        61·
        11 months ago

        Allowing Russia to conquer our allies will hardly get us high speed rail. Furthermore, the vast majority of lethal aid for Ukraine actually pays for US industry and US jobs. Congress approves money for Javelin missile production, US contractors produce the components and assemble it, then the Javelins are sent to Ukraine to blow up Russian invaders.

        There is visual confirmation of Ukraine destroying over 13,000 Russian vehicles, including over 2,500 Russian tanks. Click the link, every single example has a picture or video detailing Russia’s devastating losses.

        • realitista@lemm.eeEnglish
          4·
          11 months ago

          Exactly.

          Allowing Russia to start conquering Europe will just mean that the US will eventually have to fight a war against Europe, China, Iran, and North Korea. If we allow it to get that far I’m sure they will recruit more countries to their axis. And then the US will have a lot worse problems than lack of high speed rail.

          I’ve been against every US military engagement in my 50 year life except this one.