- cross-posted to:
- linux_memes@programming.dev
- chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
- cross-posted to:
- linux_memes@programming.dev
- chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
You must log in or register to comment.
is this what it means to “own the libs”?
If you got sudo, sure
sudo chown -R $USER:$USER /usr/libwith great power comes great responsibility!
Hunter2
This incident will be reported.
Huh? Somebody told me it would just be stars. Post yours you’ll see
What? All I am seeing is stars. That’s how I know you entered your password correctly. Passwords entered via this form input are automatically masked as stars.
password123
That’s why I always log in as root
this guy fscks
lib*
There ma, I did it ☺️.
You forgot math.h
And glibc.
And liboutofhere
No libs on my system, only leftists allowed 😤😤😤
Having maintained Linux systems for over a decade, I instantly distrust anyone who claims they understand Linux regardless of what they say next.
I have 20 years of Linux experience. I tell people ‘I know a few things.’
Would never say I know everything or understand everything though.
Just like an xkcd comic I expect to see someone reply that has 30 years experience or something.
I recently tried to compile an Raspberry pi image. I have no idea what to do when an error occurs. And I am a software developer who should at least have an idea. However goggle helps
Name em?
find / -type f -perm -a=x -exec ldd {} 2>/dev/null \;It solves the problem but you get several megabytes of output, better pipe that into a file and do some filtering and finish with sort -u
https://github.com/oasislinux/oasis
Why would you want dynamic linking? Afraid you will change your mind?
This seems really cool!
But dynamic linking saves space AFAIK
It also makes updating easier. When a lib has a bug it can be fixed by updating one package. If every application on your system was statically linked, each one of these would have to be updated individually.
But then you definitely wouldn’t have errors with different apps requiring different versions of the same library.
But then you definitely wouldn’t have errors with different apps requiring different versions of the same library.
That’s why
libfoo.so.1.2.3,libfoo.so.1.2.4,libfoo.so.1.3.9, etc. exist. Flatpak also exists. Just link to a specific version of a freedesktop.org Runtime.
But dynamic linking saves space AFAIK
Yes, it does and while I’m not a pedant about saving every possible byte in a time of terabyte SSDs, static linking everything is just insanely wasteful.
Why would you want dynamic linking?
Because static linking everything sucks.
isn’t that just flatpak with extra steps
Nice try, FBI
thats the spirit
pkg-config --list-all
The bar is too low
Praise be pkg-config
Why is Lib capitalized when Linux is case sensitive and Lib files aren’t a thing?
xbps-query -l | grep -i ‘lib’
Hello fellow Void user ☺️.
btw i also use void
libass
libcaca
liboobs
I doubted. I checked. Check passed.
$ sudo apt search liboobs Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done liboobs-1-5/jammy 3.0.0-4 amd64 GObject based interface to system-tools-backends - shared library liboobs-1-5-dbg/jammy 3.0.0-4 amd64 GObject based interface to system-tools-backends - debug symbols liboobs-1-dev/jammy 3.0.0-4 amd64 GObject based interface to system-tools-backends - dev files
That would be just me.
John Locke
I would
apt purgethat if I were you.
lib*systemd
deleted by creator
