• Herbstzeitlose@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    It wouldn’t be a Tumblr screenshot without also showing some other person reacting to the actual content.

  • SacrificedBeans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    If only it worked like that… Unfortunately the stigma is far greater on the first victim’s side, the response would lightly graze the asshole’s reputation

    • stebo02@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      if a guy claims he slept with someone but they deny it, is anyone really just going to take the guy for his word?

      • S_204@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        11 months ago

        Completely depends on the girl.

        If she’s considered to be of loose morals, people will believe the guy. If she’s the teacher’s pet and goes to Sunday services, she’s getting the benefit of the doubt.

        I spent 15 years working with high school boys. This is how it played out every time with few exceptions. We saw it multiple times per year. Society might evolve but the locker room moves a lot slower. We kept focusing on respecting each other, consent and keeping your yap shut when you’ve done something private with a consenting partner to respect privacy. Kids don’t listen.

      • orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        it’s human nature to believe what they hear first, this is sadly true

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This is pure genius and not only I aprove of it, I will actively spread it.

    A true gentleman does not talk about favours granted.

      • QuodamoresDei@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why not a small vat that you dip your erection in and in solidifies around the penis fairly quickly?

        Imagine making sure that you lay enough coats of the spray-on with proper coverage to ensure that you actually are able to protect each other.

  • mycatiskai@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Best would be “he wanted to have sex but when he warned me about his micropenis I was uncomfortable with the girth, it was too big for my tiny vagina.”

        • Droechai@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Doesn’t really matter for those that actually suffer and have body issues to get reminded that their condition is seen as something that devalues that value as a partner though

        • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s true, so that’s the thing you could shame them for per my request.

          Plus, there are so many more creative ways to insult someone than making fun of their body! Like you chose to reply without any critical thinking or reading comprehension.

        • naun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          I think they mean using a characteristic that some people gave as an insult to someone else. It’s unfair to mock someone else by using a characteristic that someone else has, which they cannot control (in this case, an aspect of their body shape, like a micro penis). The same can be said of insulting someone by calling them “retarded”, for example. It’s always demeaning to the person who has that characteristic, when it is used as an insult toward another person.

  • thorbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    Billy Mays here! Is someone being a shitty person and spreading lies? Call now to be an even shittier person and perpetuate the lie with even disgusting and depraved lies! Now with 100% more scum for that real shitbag shine you always wanted! 1-800-U-R-A-DIRTY-LIAR

    • girl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      nah the guy spreading the rumor in the first place is the biggest piece of shit in this scenario, FAFO

      • thorbot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Definitely, but telling lies in response is just sociopathic, which seems to jive with lots of folks online apparently.

        Downvote away but this is in no way a healthy response. Once again, showcasing the toxicity of people on lemmy. This place is a shit hole

        • girl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          And the original lie isn’t sociopathic? You seem to think the secondary lies are somehow more damaging to the man than the original lie is damaging to the woman

          Edit: ain’t saying this is a healthy or nice response. But he dished out a malicious, cruel lie that would damage her reputation (b/c let’s be real, the people doing this are teens and the slut label does real, lasting damage to a girl’s reputation), so she’s dishing malicious, cruel lies to damage his reputation. It’s weird that you decided that her behavior is worse than his. They’re doing the same thing to each other, he just started it in an attempt to boost his own reputation, which makes him the bigger piece of shit.

            • girl@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Their first comment specifically called the woman the shittiest person in this scenario, that the woman’s lies were even more disgusting and depraved than the man’s lie, to which I strongly disagree. I never said they were condoning the man’s behavior (they did call the man a shitty person), I just questioned why they thought the woman was worse.

        • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          You seem really concerned about the fee fees of some low value human, is this solidarity or something?

    • FizzlePopBerryTwist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t think using someone’s own insecurities against them because they were a jerk is quite the same as being truly hurtful to people who are actually going through mental distress.

        • FizzlePopBerryTwist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sure, maybe they’re just jerky to everyone, but making prejudiced presuppositions is the same stereotyping that everyone should avoid.

              • irmoz@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                It might not change how you responded, but it does change how relevant it is to what I said. I didn’t condone any prejudices presuppositions. I said maybe “using their insecurities against them” is just an excuse to be an asshole.

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        11 months ago
        1. yes that is a whole different kind of being an asshole. You don’t get to cHaLLeNge the gender identity of anyone but yourself.

        2. the things said about the made up sexual encounter are clearly ment to demean or embarass the other person. Hence why it is transphobic.

        • SacrificedBeans@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Are you talking about the earrings and Daisy part? In my mind this can be a fetish, I wouldn’t think to associate it with trans people automatically.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I genuinely dont follow point number 2.

          How does that make it a transphobic specific problem. I dont see the connection if you can help me connect the dots.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          The other person isn’t trans though. It is meant to make a defamation attenpt backfire