So I run a video production company. We have 300TB of archived projects (and growing daily).

Many years ago, our old solution for archiving was simply to dump old projects off onto an external drive, duplicate that, and have one drive at the office, one offsite elsewhere. This was ok, but not ideal. Relatively expensive per TB, and just a shit ton of physical drives.

A few years ago, we had an unlimited Google Drive and 1000/1000 fibre internet. So we moved to a system where we would drop a project onto an external drive, keep that offsite, and have a duplicate of it uploaded to Google Drive. This worked ok until we reached a hidden file number limit on Google Drive. Then they removed the unlimited sizing of Google Drive accounts completely. So that was a dead end.

So then we moved that system to Dropbox a couple of years ago, as they were offering an unlimited account. This was the perfect situation. Dropbox was feature rich, fast, integrated beautifully into finder/explorer and just a great solution all round. It meant it was easy to give clients access to old data directly if they needed, etc. Anyway, as you all know, that gravy train has come to an end recently, and we now have 12 months grace with out storage on there before we have to have this sorted back to another sytem.

Our options seem to be:

  • Go back to our old system of duplicated external drives, with one living offsite. We’d need ~$7500AUD worth of new drives to duplicate what we currently have.
  • Buy a couple of LTO-9 tape drives (2 offices in different cities) and keep one copy on an external drive and one copy on a tape archive. This would be ~$20000AUD of hardware upfront + media costs of ~$2000AUD (assuming we’d get maybe 30TB per tape on the 18TB raw LTO 9 tapes). So more expensive upfront but would maybe pay off eventually?
  • Build a linustechtips style beast of a NAS. Raw drive cost would be similar to the external drives, but would have the advantage of being accessible remotely. Would then need to spend $5000-10000AUD on the actual hardware on top of the drives. Also have the problem of ever growing storage needs. This solution we could potentially not duplicate the data to external drives though and live with RAID as only form of redundancy…
  • Another clour storage service? Anything fast and decent enough that comes at a reasonable cost?

Any advice here would be appreciated!

  • SoCleanSoFresh@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t know that I’d take on tape with your use case. There’s a good bit of tech debt involved there.

    NAS (either bought or built) + Amazon glacier or Backblaze for cloud archival backup.

    The NAS (including drives) will probably cost you $7000-8000 USD for 400ish TB of storage with room to grow

    It was easy to give clients access to old data directly if they needed, etc.

    I hope you charge for this. It would help to offset your storage costs.

    • amarino@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      300 TB in Backblaze B2 using their online calculator is $21,600 USD a year. I’m sure you can build / expand a new NAS every year for the similar prices. But then you have to deal with the overhead of managing it and replacing disks.

      • xisonc@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Wasabi has their Reserved Capacity Storage where you can get discounts if you commit to a minimum amount of storage. According to their site the absolute minimum to qualify is 25TB.

        I suspect 300+ TB will get a decent deal.