• Baron Von J@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not sure what direction you’re leaning with this one. From here:

    OKD is the upstream project of Red Hat OpenShift, optimized for continuous application development and deployment.

    So it’s the CentOS Stream of OpenShift. And just like CentOS Stream is openly available while Red Hat Enterprise is not, OKD is openly available while OpenShift is not. So revenue from OpenShift is used to support the development of OKD, just like with RHEL and CentOS Stream.

    • garam@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just saying there OKD can be a replacement of OpenShift, even it’s upstream, I just saying that it’s possible to have somekind of openshift… in OKD.

      • Raphael@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The person you’re talking to is strictly anti-opensource, he does not believe anything can be done with community projects.

        • garam@lemmy.my.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          ugh… I hope this doesn’t end up flame war. Thank you for sharing and reminds me about it.

          • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Raphael is blindly ignoring that I’ve literally said I don’t support RedHat closing access to their sources and that I’m in here applauding Alma for moving away from their dependence on a greedy corporation. Somehow my acknowledging that enterprise support costs money to provide, and that the resources to develop and distribute FOSS aren’t free, means to him that I’m just blindly opposed to FOSS and that I’m pro-corporation.

              • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Your argument boils down to “It can’t be helped”.

                In this thread I’ve said don’t use RedHat because they’re being dickbags, also maybe don’t use clones of RHEL because they then see you as a customer who isn’t paying them, and also if you need enterprise support it costs money so pay for it (because it also pays for the FOSS projects that these companies foster and contribute to).

                So what is it that I’m saying can’t be helped?

                • Raphael@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You say this and then you go on a large rant in the next post effectively defending Red Hat. You may be afflicted by Multiple Personality Disorder.

                  • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Please link/quote to me defending what RedHat is doing with access to their source repos. I’ve said repeatedly in this thread (and in your other satire s/RedHat/Linux/) post that we should all stop using RedHat and stop creating a market for Red Hat as the de facto standard, because I do not support what they’re doing with access to their source repos.