YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoTexas judge says Supreme Court ruling means she doesn’t have to officiate same-sex weddingswww.lgbtqnation.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1190arrow-down17
arrow-up1183arrow-down1external-linkTexas judge says Supreme Court ruling means she doesn’t have to officiate same-sex weddingswww.lgbtqnation.comYoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squarePizzasDontWearCapes@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year ago I don’t think any self-respecting couple would want to force an unwilling officiant to wed them If the only people who can perform weddings are clergy and elected officials, they can make it so there isn’t anyone to perform same-sex weddings
minus-squarehotdaniel@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year agoWhich is what republican terrorists are hoping for when they pass these bills. They want to “activate” conservative christian extremists so that they deny services as a group. Edit: pass bills, interpret laws
If the only people who can perform weddings are clergy and elected officials, they can make it so there isn’t anyone to perform same-sex weddings
Which is what republican terrorists are hoping for when they pass these bills. They want to “activate” conservative christian extremists so that they deny services as a group.
Edit: pass bills, interpret laws