• gmb96@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Should? Yes. Will they? No. The official’s union holds all of the cards ever since the replacement ref fiasco.

      • gmb96@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you are massively understating or just forgetting how awful the replacement refs were. As bad as things are now, it was at a whole other level. It was so bad that within a month of the season, the NFL gave them almost literally everything they wanted.

    • AbVag@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. This is why I laugh whenever I hear someone say how the league should do something about it. It’s not that they won’t. It’s that they can’t.

      • owlwise13@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I disagree, it is more likely they don’t care enough to change it. The current system makes more money directly and indirectly (gambling). The minuet, the net profits dip because of bad officiating they will change it overnight

        • skycake10@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re ignoring the point being made here: what, concretely, do you do to improve officiating? You can’t just fire bad refs because the guys you replace them with are going to be worse.

          • markomarkovich@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You could make them full time employees and compensate them based on how well they perform like most any other profession