Hi,

I’ve written some microservices and am looking to deploy them. Since I am not very confident in cloud pricing (= too expensive right now), I am looking into ways of operating a very small server setup.

Lets say I have 5 services, one is the database, 3 should be run as jobs every minute, one service should be scaled based on load.

I am aware that basically described tasks that k8s or nomad would be very good at it. The issue with them is: While I am going to update the services, etc, I do not need a large cluster. I am very sure that I can start with one pod/node and maybe get a second one, if needed.

For this setup, k8s (or other flavors) is just overkill (learning and maintaining it). Nomad from hashicorp looks totally cool for that, but it is recommended to have 3 servers with crazy specs for each of them (doing quorum, leader follower, replication, etc.) Which is overkill when I plan to have 1 worker node in total :D

Nomad has `-dev` option running server and agent on the same node, but in production? I don’t know. Nomads server also uses his ip and other things for identity. When they change, the server instance is basically dead and loses its data. That’s why a quorum of 3 servers is recommended as a minimal prod setup.

Docker compose is not ideal, because I would like to update single containers without tearing everything down.

Also, cron for my periodic tasks is not part of docker or docker swarm except plugins, workarounds, or configuring a container running `cron` but then meddling with `flock`, etc.

​

I am aware that it actually does not sound like I need an orchestrator, but monitoring all the jobs and restarting a container manually sounds not optimal for me and maybe there is something out there, that helps me.

Since the tech community knows more than me, I would love to get some other opinions or point of views.

Thanks!

​

​

  • HosonZes@alien.topOPBEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    k space. You could rent 2 small servers, one for development and one to

    This is a new option. Thanks for this. Did you used this in production? I know I will have custom and tailored images running, because each of my containers (besides the database) will be my own services, and cloudron looks like it was rather designed to pick a ready solution, am I understanding it correctly?

    It also says, it keeps the systems up to date, which again is very high level, usually it is some sort of terraform to provision or ansible to configure the machine and abstracting those details makes it hard for me as a tech guy to understand, what they actually are doing.

    • subven1@alien.topBEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      Did you used this in production?

      I run 3 Cloudron servers for many years and administer another 4 with some just beeing used inside a LAN.

      ​

      cloudron looks like it was rather designed to pick a ready solution, am I understanding it correctly?

      Most users will just pick apps from the store but others like myself use Cloudron to host their own services and custom app packages. It is actually pretty easy and there is a lot of help and templates at the Cloudron app packaging forum if you just start.

      ​

      It also says, it keeps the systems up to date, which again is very high level

      Cloudron uses neither Ansible nor Terraform and relies on scripts and crons. It uses automatic Ubuntu security updates, firewall and a bit of OS hardening to secure the plattform. You can take a look at the sources if you are curious.