• agk927@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    2014 Rodgers deserved it over Watt, that was an insane season he put up. Much better season than any qb in the league right now is having

    • The-Implication-0@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it’s not about how good the defensive player was necessarily in a given year. It’s the combination of a lack of clear cut number 1 QB + insane defensive player this year.

      • agk927@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He was basically the clear cut best qb and had the upper hand over Romo

      • agk927@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Romo was great, but Rodgers did so much more. Plus 38/5 beats out 34/9 any day of the week

        • crash218579@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s true Rodgers had him beat on td-int ratio, but Romo had the higher y/a and passer rating, all while having to deal with Garrett as a coach.

    • scarrylary@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Watts team didn’t even make the playoffs. Browns are at 3 wins max right now without Myles.

    • TetrisTech@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The thing about 2014 is that no player is ever gonna win MVP if their team isn’t in the playoffs, as unfair as that is to Watt

    • DryDefenderRS@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not saying 2014 Watt was more valuable, or even contradicting that QBs should get it.

      I’m saying that if 2012/14 Watt and 2009 Revis weren’t enough, nothing can be.