| Rank | Team | Adj. Win % | Weekly Rank Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Philadelphia | .809 | -- |
| 2 | Baltimore | .747 | +1 |
| 3 | Cleveland | .728 | +2 |
| 4 | Detroit | .711 | -- |
| 5 | Kansas City | .704 | -3 |
| 6 | Jacksonville | .693 | +1 |
| 7 | San Francisco | .683 | +1 |
| 8 | Pittsburgh | .651 | -2 |
| 9 | Miami | .615 | +1 |
| 10 | Dallas | .592 | +1 |
| 11 | Houston | .571 | +3 |
| 12 | Seattle | .562 | -3 |
| 13 | Cincinnati | .553 | -1 |
| 14 | Minnesota | .516 | -1 |
| 15 | Indianapolis | .514 | -- |
| 16 | Buffalo | .498 | +2 |
| 17 | Denver | .492 | +3 |
| 18 | LA Rams | .465 | +5 |
| 19 | Tampa Bay | .438 | -2 |
| 20 | New Orleans | .436 | +2 |
| 21 | Las Vegas | .427 | -- |
| 22 | LA Chargers | .420 | -6 |
| 23 | NY Jets | .418 | -4 |
| 24 | Green Bay | .397 | +3 |
| 25 | Tennessee | .379 | -1 |
| 26 | Atlanta | .374 | -1 |
| 27 | Washington | .342 | -1 |
| 28 | NY Giants | .295 | +3 |
| 29 | Chicago | .275 | -1 |
| 30 | New England | .272 | -- |
| 31 | Arizona | .262 | -2 |
| 32 | Carolina | .180 | -- |
I’m using a simplified/modified Colley Matrix iteration process (https://www.colleyrankings.com/method.html)
To summarize, you take the win percentage of every team and correct it against the win percentage of their opponents. Then you have a new win percentage. And I repeat that process until the correction factor is below .001. Essentially this is what I would expect the win percentages to be if the teams played an average team every week.
You must log in or register to comment.
Well well well…. How the turntables…
So if I understand correctly, you did all this work to prove that Carolina really is butt this year? The rams and chargers adjustments are rather intriguing.