Due to how poor twitter is run, he can’t get it back.

I wish celebs would just ditch the platform already.

    • Syldon@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Twitter is international. It will not have the same appeal with segregation by nationality.

      The Dutch Government has a much higher trust rating than ours has. Can you imagine the same uptake if the UK did likewise. I certainly would have zero trust with the current people in power.

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is Mastodon, there is no segregation. This is just where they’re posting their updates, you can still read them from your own Mastodon instance.

        • Syldon@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If is it ran by a nationality then it will have segregation. National prejudice is very prevalent.

          • loobkoob@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re on feddit.uk and I’m on kbin.social and we’re both still here, commenting on a lemmy.world thread. Unless you’re browsing by local (ie, only posts that are made on your local instance), or your instance is very defederation-happy, it doesn’t have to mean much.

            • Syldon@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then I have to apologise for my ignorance. Reddit refugee here. I obviously do not understand how this works yet.

              • loobkoob@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s okay, it can be a little hard to wrap your head around!

                What helped me is thinking of it like email: I can use a Gmail account, you can use a Hotmail account, and someone else can use their own private mail server. We all go to different websites/programs/apps to access our emails, and those programs might have different features, layouts, etc, but we can all still email each other. They’re all federated with each other. And if you start getting emails from marketing@spamcentral.com, promotions@spamcentral.com, etc, you can block the entire spamcentral.com email domain - ie, defederate from it.

                The fediverse works very similarly. We can all use different websites with different layouts and a few different features, but all of them can communicate with each other and show common content because they’re federated with each other.

                There’s a big benefit to this: no single company can control the fediverse. If your instance - feddit.uk - has to shut down, or it turns out to be run by nazis, or they start trying to charge users vast amounts of money to use the instance, or make some other move you don’t like, you can just make an account on another instance and continue to use the rest of the fediverse. Maybe a few communities that were hosted on your previous instance will become inaccessible, but the larger fediverse will still be available.

                • Syldon@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I am fairly savvy with what makes the internet work. If Lemmy is linked then it must have a central control point. This is the piece that I was unaware of. I was under the impression that each server is freestanding. I have a log in for Feddit and also for Lemmy.

                  So is each instance (eg: Feddit, Lemmy.one, Lemmy.ml) on a host machine in someone’s home or is it hosted on a main server?

      • waltuh@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just imagine the cringy name they’d come up with… BritTwit or something.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it was the instance where people could follow NHS, public health, local authoritty and national updates, I think it could fly.

      • cook_pass_babtridge@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The actual trust in the government isn’t the issue, but having their own Mastodon instance would mean that you know this message came from this government. You can verify it with normal HTTPS, rather than just trusting who Twitter gives the blue checkmark to (anyone remember when the Conservative party changed their Twitter name to Fact Check UK and were able to keep their blue check?)

        It could be the same for news companies - you’d know that “@krishnangm@channel4.com” is the real guy, because the domain name is owned by Channel 4, and verified by HTTPS.