You must log in or register to comment.
The company that won’t let you run an emulator, won’t let the predictive keyboard run a swear word, and launched a music service on the premise of “how can we help the RIAA” wants to put “rules” on A.I.
Every fucking corporation is suddenly concerned about AI and is asking for government control, because they don’t want to lose control of the market. Disney wants to use AI to churn out product, but wants to make damn sure you can’t use AI to entertain yourself without Disney.
They want regulatory capture. If they get their way, AI will become like PayPal. Banks didn’t like the idea of PayPal, so suddenly there were all sorts of concern about customer safety - and then there were a bunch of regulations insuring that nobody could ever feasibly create a new PayPal.
Easy 😂:
The First Law: An AI may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
The Second Law: An AI must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
The Third Law: An AI must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
All jokes aside, Cook isn’t wrong. If we don’t create some sort of rule set, things will get out of control quickly.
All jokes aside, Cook isn’t wrong. If we don’t create some sort of rule set, things will get out of control quickly.
No they won’t. People are just tainted by decades of doom and gloom sci-fi regarding AI.
Tom can say whatever he wants.
What he needs to focus on is Apple shipping a new Siri in iOS 18 that finally works after 13 years. Then we will take Apple’s advice under consideration.
With… Dua Lipa?
Let’s start with: 1) Actually pay the artist.
I_Asimov_1920 has entered the chat.
I’d enjoy having an AI that can hold intelligent conversations tbh…
I have a feeling it might be more enjoyable than most comments online from humans.
Any large compainies currently in the AI game would only accept rules that favor them and by extension limit other companies. Any laws regulating how these top tier compainies use AI and what they do with the information would also be opposed.
Honestly all I hear from Cook is:
We are behind on AI and the government needs to step in so we can catch up.
woah their.
spitting straight facts!
If apple doesnt release an amazing AI Framework at WWDC in 2024; then we will know they are a lost cause…
They probably shot themselves in the foot when going with their Privacy facade.I don’t think they can easily implement ai features in their phones and other products without some kind of user data.So,now he has to come up with excuses.Predictive text on ios is hardly any good compared to competitors and that was the example he could come up with
Let’s lobby to regulate so we can catch up
So does corporate greed.
Let me guess, apples stance will be a barter with Google. ‘we’ll loosen up our stance on RCS and you help us in AI in return’