• gyman122@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Honestly this makes sense. The calls to go to Heinicke were a classic example of the backup QB always being the most popular guy in town, he was really equally awful. Ridder’s not gonna make your chances of winning any worse, he’s had the best game a Falcons QB had this season by far, he’s a better runner, and you might as well see what you have in him before next season

    • FantasyTrash@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Offensive points per game under Ridder: 16

      Offensive points per game under Heinicke: 24

      Ridder turnovers: 12 in nine games

      Heineke turnovers: 1 in three games

      How is Ridder the better option?

    • Thecobs@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Offensive points per game under ridder: 16

      Offensive points per game under heineke: 24

      Ridder turnovers: 8 in 7 games

      Heineke turnovers: 1 in 3 games

      Just because the Falcons lost didnt mean it was because of him.

      • it678@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Heinecke wasn’t the reason we scored those points though. 7 of them were actually when ridder came in

    • lronicGasping@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      he was equally awful

      No the fuck he was not lmao this isn’t true regardless of whether you’re box score watching or actually watching the games.

      • Falcon84@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Idk man I watched the games and even if Heinicke was slightly better he wasn’t moving the needle enough to justify playing him over someone that is much younger and can still develop.