On this day in 1884, the “Berlin Conference” began when delegations from nearly every Western European country and the U.S. met in Germany to develop a set of protocols for the seizure and control of African resources.
The conference, which had no African representatives, was the first international conference ever on the subject of Africa, and dealt almost soley with the matter of its exploitation.
At the time, approximately 80% of African land and resources were under domestic control; the influence of Europeans was most strongly exerted on the coast. Following it, colonial powers began seizing resources further inland.
As a result of the conference, which continued into 1885, a “General Act” was signed and ratified by all but one of the 14 nations at the table, the U.S. being the sole exception. The Act’s main features were the establishment of a regime of free trade stretching across the middle of Africa, the development of which became the rationale for the recognition of the short-lived “Congo Free State”, the abolition of the overland slave trade, and the principle of “effective occupation”.
The Conference’s rapacious intentions for Africa were noted by outsiders: socialist journalist Daniel De Leon described the conference as “an event unique in the history of political science…Diplomatic in form, it was economic in fact.”
Before the Conference ended, the Lagos Observer declared that “the world had, perhaps, never witnessed a robbery on so large a scale.” Theodore Holly, the first black Protestant Episcopal Bishop in the U.S., condemned the delegates as having “come together to enact into law, national rapine, robbery and murder”.
Berlin 1884: Remembering the conference that divided Africa
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- ❤️ Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 💖 Come talk in the New Weekly Queer thread
- 💛 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- 💚 Come and talk in the Daily Bloomer Thread
- ⭐️ September Movie Nominations ⭐️
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
the pope stuff is so funny, with all these tradcaths getting mad at him. you can’t do that! he’s the pope! if you have beef with him you’re definitionally a protestant!
A nonreligious friend commented “should the catholic church be more democratic?” and I mean, Im no theologist but that sounds like basically protestantism again.
The conclusion that protestantism was right and correct is inescapable.
and somehow they’re worse than the catholics anyway
At least modern Catholic doctrine is that the Big Bang and Darwinian evolution are both correct. I don’t go to mass anymore because of their sheltering of SA-inclined priests and nuns, but I respect the church’s respect for science.
Protestants didn’t protest hard enough.
The continued survival of the pope proves that statement.
Prostestants when theere r some ants aruond (their protestinh the ants)
Sedevacantists are the best. Imagine being so Catholic you answer thr question “is the pope catholic” with “no”.
the pope is coptic
Well A pope is coptic.
what even are these words
Copts are an ethnic group in Egypt
can I blame white christofascists for my ignorance here or is this one on me
Oi mate, just because i’m protesting against the pope doesn’t mean i’m protestant