| Team | SI | SN | Y! | B/R | CBS | USA | NFL | ESPN | Avg | SD | CGPR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Philadelphia (0) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 2 | Kansas City (1) | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 3 |
| 3 | Detroit (2) | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 4 |
| 4 | San Francisco (3) | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 9 |
| 5 | Baltimore (-3) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 2 |
| 6 | Miami (2) | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6.4 | 1.1 | 10 |
| 7 | Dallas (2) | 7 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7.0 | 1.6 | 8 |
| 8 | Cleveland (3) | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 7.6 | 1.6 | 5 |
| 9 | Jacksonville (-5) | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 8 | 9 | 9.4 | 0.9 | 7 |
| 10 | Cincinnati (-4) | 6 | 14 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 10.8 | 2.4 | 12 |
| 11 | Seattle (1) | 11 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 9 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 10.9 | 1.1 | 14 |
| 12 | Houston (5) | 15 | 13 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 10 | 13 | 11.9 | 2.0 | 13 |
| 13 | Pittsburgh (0) | 13 | 7 | 15 | 14 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12.5 | 2.4 | 11 |
| 14 | Minnesota (2) | 12 | 12 | 13 | 15 | 13 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 13.9 | 1.6 | 6 |
| 15 | Buffalo (-5) | 14 | 15 | 14 | 12 | 15 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14.0 | 0.9 | 15 |
| 16 | LA Chargers (-2) | 16 | 19 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 15 | 18 | 16 | 17.0 | 1.5 | 16 |
| 17 | New Orleans (-2) | 17 | 17 | 19 | 16 | 17 | 22 | 16 | 17 | 17.6 | 2.0 | 19 |
| 18 | Indianapolis (1) | 21 | 18 | 20 | 18 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 18.1 | 1.6 | 20 |
| 19 | Las Vegas (5) | 18 | 16 | 22 | 19 | 18 | 18 | 21 | 21 | 19.1 | 2.0 | 18 |
| 20 | Tampa Bay (1) | 22 | 20 | 21 | 20 | 23 | 21 | 19 | 19 | 20.6 | 1.4 | 22 |
| 21 | Denver (4) | 19 | 22 | 17 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 20 | 22 | 20.8 | 2.0 | 21 |
| 22 | NY Jets (-4) | 20 | 21 | 18 | 22 | 21 | 20 | 22 | 23 | 20.9 | 1.6 | 17 |
| 23 | Washington (-1) | 24 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 20 | 29 | 23 | 20 | 23.4 | 2.8 | 24 |
| 24 | Atlanta (-4) | 23 | 24 | 23 | 23 | 25 | 25 | 24 | 24 | 23.9 | 0.8 | 27 |
| 25 | Tennessee (-2) | 25 | 27 | 25 | 25 | 24 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 25.1 | 1.0 | 26 |
| 26 | LA Rams (1) | 27 | 26 | 27 | 26 | 26 | 19 | 27 | 25 | 25.4 | 2.7 | 25 |
| 27 | Green Bay (-1) | 26 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 27 | 26 | 26 | 27 | 26.3 | 0.7 | 23 |
| 28 | Arizona (4) | 28 | 29 | 29 | 28 | 29 | 27 | 29 | 28 | 28.4 | 0.7 | 30 |
| 29 | Chicago (0) | 31 | 28 | 28 | 29 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 29 | 28.6 | 1.1 | 28 |
| 30 | New England (-2) | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 31 | 30.1 | 0.4 | 29 |
| 31 | NY Giants (-1) | 29 | 31 | 32 | 31 | 31 | 32 | 31 | 30 | 30.9 | 1.0 | 31 |
| 32 | Carolina (-1) | 32 | 32 | 31 | 32 | 32 | 31 | 32 | 32 | 31.8 | 0.5 | 32 |
[SI] ( https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/11/14/week-10-power-rankings-lions-browns-49ers )
[CGPR] ( https://old.reddit.com/user/velociraptorfarmer/comments/17uuzt9/2023_week_10_nfl_power_rankings/ )
Is this weird to write about people like this everyone, or is it just me? Like I get the Tua injury history aspect of it but Tyreek has never missed a game as a Dolphin, like it just seems kinda callous to be like; “Well you’re doing well, but if your two most important players got hurt, hoo boy that would stink. Wouldn’t it?”
Especially considering that it’s from the NFL’s rankings compared to a different outlet
Nah I’m with you 100%. There’s not very many teams that could lose their 2 top guys and be okay. The 49ers lost 2/3 of their best players and immediately lost 3 straight games.
Hell the reason everyone is pumping up the Vikings this much is because they’ve won 2 games with a backup qb. Nothing wrong with that but it just goes to show that the immediate reaction to losing Cousins was this team can’t possibly compete anymore.
They could have said the team leans too heavily on one or two players (and I’m not even sure that’s true). Why bring injury into it?
If all the teams in the NFL had to play without their best 30 players, except the Giants the Giants might win the Super Bowl