Went to the dealership the other weekend to test drive an EV with my wife. She knew the exact model she wanted, and the dealer ship wouldn’t let her test drive it. They kept trying to get her into the model lower that didn’t have all the bells and wistles.
It only after we got frustrated that they tried to let us drive the model she’d been asking for. We just left. Dealships are pretty pointless
The history of dealerships is pretty fucked up.
Through lobbying they’ve made themselves a required middle man, and the owners make a shit ton of money. You can pick your dealer, but you can’t pick to not use a dealer.
Which applies to far more than just car dealerships, a lot of “economy” is just people installing themselves as middlemen, siphoning off money from others’ work and using it to protect their position.
Economists call this “rent-seeking.” They add no value and take a cut.
And the reason they’re so powerful, at least in some states, is that they’re a major source of sales tax.
And who are (by far) the largest advertisers in the print media? Car dealers and real estate agents. Is it any surprise that you don’t find any articles about these parasites?
Real estate agent is an amazing scam. They make you think they’re necessary, and then add 3% each to the price of the house.
Fucking legends
You can now. Tesla sued over this
Rivian is another EV that’s skipping the dealership model.
Good luck getting parts for one when you need them though.
They have some weird loophole so that they also get the dealers cut…
But I’m pretty sure for every other brand, you still need a dealer.
deleted by creator
Having to go through a dealer shouldn’t be a thing in the first place.
It sort of made sense back when there were ACTUAL customization options you could have. What paint job? Seats? Trim? Wheels? Extra options? It was neat.
These days, just buying from one of three canned models? Yeah, fuck dealer middle men.
The one thing that dealers provide which is still of value is the test drive. Customizing on a web site is all well and good, but trying before you buy is crucial with such a major purchase. I would rather not be stuck in a car that I find uncomfortable for any reason.
Not just that, all configuration options are available on a website and can be as complicated as the manufacturer likes without the need of the dealer.
You miss a fair bit of context not being able to see the options personally, of course, but certainly isn’t necessary.
Yea… and instead of keeping the options and upping convenience, the capitalists use it as an oportunity to capture their customers for some up-selling…
Ahh, the beautiful innovations of institutionalized greed.
This is just another reason why the independent dealership model needs to end. They only make the purchasing experience worse, at this point.
My friend went into a Ford dealership in Sacramento to try and buy an F 150 lightning. The dealers completely talked him out of it. They make bigger commissions off of ice vehicles
Last time I went looking for an EV the dealerships tried talking me out of it, they even said hybrids are a fad… ridiculous that we’re forced to go through these business full of grade-school intelligence douches to get a car we need. Hopefully all the companies take the route of Tesla and Ford and allow direct buy from the company soon
When I bought my EV, the dealer helping me talked shit about EVs the whole time. The job attracts bros who like muscle cars. EVs are still small PP cars to them. I got a great deal, though, so I couldn’t complain.
This was one thing I really enjoyed with buying a Tesla. 0 pressure to buy, did a test drive. Went in and purchased afterwards with no extras, markups, or dealer exclusive garbage. Was a great buying experience. I’m sure Rivian and the other EV only brands are just as easy and great
Imagine being a paying customer then being talked down as if you are a brain dead idiot to be milked.
The Post? Really? Half of that article is an ad for the Post itself!
jalopnik ≠ the post
Right! I totally missed that! Why is Jalopnik advertising for the Post?
I can see why you would get that idea, the pushes to check out the original article were excessive, but the site has no relation to them. See https://g-omedia.com/brands/
It might be just the writer or their style when quoting a different source, or just a fluke.
