ntrev@alien.topB to Apple@hardware.watchEnglish · 10 months agoYou Paid $1,000 for an iPhone, but Apple Still Controls Itwww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkYou Paid $1,000 for an iPhone, but Apple Still Controls Itwww.nytimes.comntrev@alien.topB to Apple@hardware.watchEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square9fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squaredangil@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoThey have to do this. Because their partners in China sell replacement parts for a lot less on side channels, probably breaking contracts, and they can’t enforce any of it.
They have to do this. Because their partners in China sell replacement parts for a lot less on side channels, probably breaking contracts, and they can’t enforce any of it.