• Xanadia@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    80m for a 30y old with 1 year left on his contract is insane. Instead, Bayern should try to get him for free next summer.

    • lesseva96@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s not just a 30 year old lol. He’s one of the best Premier League strikers of all time. If they don’t buy him, odds are he’ll stay in the Prem to chase after Shearer’s record. I hear United are looking for a striker…

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      well problem is that if he leaves on a free then he might as well just move within the prem and get Shearers record.

      Bayern’s best shot is buying him right now.

  • seacocker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s surely the highest they’ll go with a year left on the contract. I think he’s either going to sign a new one or leave for free next summer.

    • elroon@lemmy.oneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If Bayern are serious about getting Kane, they can’t possibly think €80m would be enough. I don’t think Levy will even think about anything less than 90m pounds. If Bayern are unwilling to go up, then Kane surely stays.

      • SatouKazuma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well I hope Spurs enjoy seeing him in a United kit. Levy’s going to end up shooting Spurs in the foot.

        • theinspectorst@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m torn on whether Levy is right here. It seems crazy to let Kane go for free next summer when they can get this much money for him now. But I can’t see what proven PL or equivalent striker Spurs would be able to sign behind him, especially with no European football on offer.

          I imagine Levy’s gamble is that Champions League qualification is worth more (the pure revenue plus whatever value Spurs put on the ability to attract better players) than what they’re being offered for Kane now, and that finishing outside the top 4 for the fourth time in five years would pose more fundamental problems for their footballing and financial outlook - so they might as well hold Kane now and roll the dice for a top 4 finish.

          • Baconheatedradiator@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Levy might be correct in this instance especially from a financial point of view, but didn’t he promise Harry kane that he could leave like three seasons ago, and then went back on his word?

            Why Harry hasn’t kicked off/protested more is beyond me, he’s a world class striker at a mediocre club that is only going backwards. The dude should have left when pochettino did.

            • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              He probably learned during the City saga that there is nothing he can do. He signed the contract and that’s that.

              Levy might be correct in this instance especially from a financial point of view

              Possibly, but that’s assuming the gamble pays off and they secure top 4. I have a sneaking suspicion they’ll miss out on CL regardless, Kane or no-Kane. I think we might we’ll end up with an “everybody loses” type of situation where Kane leaves for free next year after Spurs finish 5/6th.

              • theinspectorst@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                More than a sneaking suspicion for me - my base case is that Spurs aren’t a top 4 side. The only way I see them making it is if being back in the CL is such a wrench for Arsenal, Newcastle and Man Utd that their league form suffers badly. It certainly wouldn’t be the first time this had happened, but all three clubs are on paper better than Spurs and have been strengthening their squads over the summer.

                • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah I pretty much agree with you. Also, it’s typically Europa League that screws with league form. CL has a bit fewer and better placed fixtures (the thursday-sunday cycle seems to really mess with players’ recovery and schedule).

              • Gingerrific@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I just don’t see them getting top 4 with Arsenal and Newcastle being as strong as they are. To make matters worse Liverpool have addressed their midfield issues, and who knows what will happen with Chelsea, it’s not like their squad lacks talent and Poch is a good manager (don’t let his PSG stint fool you)

          • SatouKazuma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Full disclosure: As a Bayern fan, I’d love to see Kane with us, but I think there has to be a limit on the outgoing spend. The striker market is just broken right now.

            • theinspectorst@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Striker market is broken, market for English players is broken, and market for PL players is broken - and Kane ticks all three boxes.