• dakar@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Turns out forcing people to use Twitter less makes people use Twitter less, what a discovery!

    • GunnarRunnar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      But have you considered paying $8 a month to use features that used to be free and also associate yourself with far right?

  • Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good! Hope to see the same stories about Reddit and other major social media platforms that have taken steps to prioritize profit over the community.

    The users are your golden apple. Abuse them, the apple turns sour.

    • necrxfagivs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know if it’s just me, but I’m barely using reddit/twitter and now I spend most of my online time on Lemmy/Mastodon.

    • Niello@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wonder how much of it is because of Threads and how much of it is from making the site inaccessible without accounts and the rate limit.

      • vaguerant@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hard to tell. It’s been in decline since January though, so some of it is just Twitter being a place people want to be less and less.

  • ntzm [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that people who have paid get to have their replies appear first means that you see the people with the worst opinions (people who are fine with giving Musk money) most of the time, just makes it a very un-fun experience.

  • Salvo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Social media company’s don’t understand what makes a Social network great. It isn’t advertising, or social manipulation, or exorbitant subscription fees and API charges. It isn’t restriction of speech or freedom of speech, it isn’t algorithmically controlled moderation and curation.

    It is the people that make a social network great.

    • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It is the people that make a social network great.

      You’re right. I say this every time these conversations come up. It’s the people that hold the power. Imagine how quickly things would change if everyone stopped using Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Threads, WhatsApp, Telegram, Snapchat, etc. overnight. From billions/millions to users, to zero. Can you imagine how quickly the companies would change/adjust/pivot/react?

      Social media company’s don’t understand what makes a Social network great.

      Disagree. They know. It’s just that they’re trapped in an unethical business model that will never allow them to make it great. This is because the platform’s interests are constantly at war with the user’s interests. This was a critical mistake in the earlier days of the internet.

      Google itself identified this in the early days in a paper that they wrote. They originally just wanted to organize the internet. But with an advertising revenue model, the interests of the advertisers was ultimately gonna be more important.

      Call it “enshittification”: Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re still on Twitter, you’re part of the problem. I don’t care about your excuses.