• Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    No they’re not. They are arguing against a straw man so ridiculous it’s more of a small sad-looking pile of straw. And they know it, too; they’re a regular car-brained troll in this community, and they’ve had it pointed out to them why their arguments are nonsense many times before.

    • jimbo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They are arguing against a straw man so ridiculous it’s more of a small sad-looking pile of straw.

      What is the “straw man” in their argument? Be specific.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        No, I won’t. Because you’re smart enough to figure it out yourself. The only barrier to figuring it out is a deliberate obstinance and opposition to better urban planning.

        • jimbo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If I knew what the fuck was going on in your brain when you said something, I wouldn’t have to ask. I’d also be a lot richer because it would also mean I’m psychic.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Alright, here it is so that people with no critical thinking skills can get it:

            Nobody, at any point, said we should make the speed limit on all roads 6 km/h.

            Nobody even said we should make the speed limit on some roads 6 km/h.

            The actual thing actually proposed by road safety advocates and people in favour of better urban planning is reducing the speed limit on local residential streets, and in commercial shopping districts. Usually to 30 km/h.