This post is not only to try finding the best Mastodon instance/server but I also wanted to express about the Mastodon instances. Most of Mastodon servers are apparently harsh about other instances that include things they don’t like and are quite serious about getting those Internet points putting how the place isn’t welcome for “bigotry” and is for everyone and so diverse, and I wouldn’t have any problems with this if this wasn’t frequently used by people who will try to shut you if they disagree enough with you and will try to present themselves as so virtuous. You’d expect that the free side of the Internet would have people that value freedom and should let anything that isn’t a crime or something that prejudice the instance itself or whatever space they’re in but it seems this vision is getting far from the reality with time.

    • Milk@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      First half is saying tolerance to the intolerant causes intolerance while the second half is saying intolerance to the intolerant causes intolerance. It is a writing error, I wasn’t talking about the idea itself despite I disagreeing with it.

      • Whiskey Pickle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        that’s not an error by the writer, that’s an error in your understanding of the text and the meaning of the word “paradox”.

        • Milk@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          So he agrees with both statements? That makes him a paradox for agree with opposite ideas so.

            • Milk@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I understand what the text tried to say and I disagree but I want to point out the writing itself is wrong and not the writer ideas. If you try to re-read the text you can notice the writing unintentionally implies different things despite being supposed to be the same.

              • Whiskey Pickle@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                I understand what the text tried

                [X} DOUBT

                but I want to point out the writing itself is wrong

                incorrect. you simply fail to comprehend it. how unfortunate.

                If you try to re-read the text you can notice the writing unintentionally implies different things despite being supposed to be the same.

                you’re seeing what you wish to.

                • Milk@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you insist to trying tricking yourself that I was exposing an idea and not pointing out the errors in the text composition, why didn’t you just corrected the text and said you disagree to then go do your life things? I mean, it’s easier to forcing yourself to not see the obvious.

                  • Whiskey Pickle@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    i find it much less likely that everyone who disagrees with you is wrong, and that you simply fail to grasp the clear logic of something that you happen to disagree with and choose to lash out at me with insults rather than to admit you were wrong.

      • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        re-read the title. do you not know the meaning of the word “paradox”?

        ignorance on your part does not constitute an error on the part of the writer.

        • Milk@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The title is the paradox and not paradoxes. Also, agreeing with the two ideas makes him a paradox or a double standard guy.

          • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            that’s not what is happening. it’s sad to witness such a spectacular failure to comprehend.