• Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is a bad analogy, a child can’t wander into a shady bar, late at night, while at home, in their room, while doing what they can to hide their activities from their parents, in the way that they can going on an inappropriate website.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bro. Analogies don’t need to be 100% realistic.

      How many analogies have you read involving fictional characters? Or saying stuff like “that’s a catch-22”? Do you say “actually, that phrase comes from a work of fiction, so it’s invalid”?

      “It’s like when Homer can’t stop eating donuts” - “Oh but Homer doesn’t exist. Checkmate!”

      An ant carrying a leave is like a dude carrying three cars on his back. “Whoa! It’s impossible for a dude to carry that much weight!”

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, The shady bar thing has happened before. So it’s not unrealistic and that wasn’t my point anyway. It simply does not fit the situation provided in the way the poster is trying to use it. There are far, far, greater implications of negligence for a child sneaking away, to a shady bar, in the middle of the night, than there is with a kid going on an inappropriate website.