• John_Bot@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Idk why this is such a sticking point for people.

    They’ve said the lawyer said it was a problem to try adoption and that the conservatorship was the way to go. Isn’t it very possible they heard that then never looked into it further, thinking the guy gave them good info?

    It doesn’t sound like they’ve done anything wrong with the money or anything. I’m sure he’s been invited to every Christmas, etc.

    At what point is the piece of paper important if everything else is above board?

    • reddit_already@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Or if their main goal was to get him into Ole Miss without triggering NCAA violations, and if consevatorship was both simpler and sufficient, why look any further into adoption? Just do the less complicated thing.

    • ExtensionDigs@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      BOOOOOO… we don’t want your facts when we have arguments based on emotional and biased premises that support our conclusions!!! Get outta here already!

    • ZombieFish15@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They’ve said the lawyer said it was a problem to try adoption and that the conservatorship was the way to go

      Because a simple Google search for state laws will tell you otherwise. Because of his age there was no restriction on him being adopted. It was simple paper work that, IIRC, you dont even have to go to a court hearing for. The paper just gets filed and thats that. The conservatorship was actually more of a process that adopting him would have been.