• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’ve apparently missed the point. Graphene exists solely to harden security and privacy by disabling the googly parts of the phone. That is clearly what was meant by “without Google”

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Graphene is is way over hyped. You can basically the same thing with lineage os. The key is just not using gsf

          • LaggyKar@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            But then you can’t use any apps that require Play Services. The killer feature of GrapheneOS is letting you run Play Services in a sandbox.

          • sadreality@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Unlocked bootloader is considered a vulnerability tho

            But if your threats model is toxic Tim, satya and sundar, it will do the job just fine.

            • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You can relock the bootloader though can’t you?

              Genuine question. I used to be an avid ROMer back int day until I got really really annoyed at all the hoops I had to jump through to use Google Wallet.

              Now I have a Pixel 7a and I’m considering ROMs again. So I am wondering if I can just relock the bootloader once I find a ROM I like and it’ll pass all the Safety net bullshit and allow me to use my phone like it should be, just with a custom ROM on it.

    • 520@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      And how do you know there aren’t hardware level trackers in Google’s chips? The kind Graphene can’t override? Do you trust Google not to do that?

      • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because this will get .001% more total data considering the low number of GrapheneOS users. Besides, this is highly illegal and would result in significant public outcry and legal consequences far greater in cost than any potential benefits.

        And if you cannot trust Google with their processors, you cannot trust any other company either.

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because all of that has stopped OEMs in the past…oh wait! No it hasn’t (looks at Lenovo)

      • Nath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The people who install Graphene and other modified Android variants on their devices are a lot more likely to be monitoring packets sent from their devices.

        Believe me, we’d know the same day an android device that had been de-Googled called home. That would make worldwide news.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I trust them not to do it. Cause when it was found out not if when it would hurt them.