• axtualdave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s more insidious than you think. They’re using the “we’ve got a financial interest in how the company performs” argument in the same way they did in the recent Supreme Court case allowing businesses to discriminate against gay people.

    As stakeholders, if Target continues to offer LGBTQ+ merchandise for sale, these Attorneys General will argue that the financial losses Target might suffer is enough to sue them, to force them to stop selling that merchandise.

    It’s fucking evil. We should not stand for it.