• @krigo666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    99
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    No it’s not, ad blocker is working perfectly… :)

    Now even more seriously, the amount of ads and how aggressive they are is what led to people using adblockers. It’s ridiculous having to see 2 full 20 sec ads at the beggining and then interrupting as it pleases every 3 or 4 mins. On top of that the ads are all lies or manipulation. Fuck Google and their shitty ads.

    YouTube Premium? LMAO! Not worth the price, if they had a simpler cheaper tier, just for no ads, 2€ per month I’d might consider it. 8.50€? Fucking rip off. Again, fuck Google.

    • blargerer
      link
      fedilink
      208 months ago

      Honestly, going back to that many ads would annoy me now, but I dealt with it in the day, the thing that finally got me to start adblocking everything were ads that would crash the video players, and ads that would play for like 10 minutes but were skippable after 20 seconds. I play stuff in the background all the time , I shouldn’t have to actively monitor an ad.

      • @Igloojoe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        For me, it’s always volume on ads. Ads are usually like 5x louder than what you’re watching so it’s just an assault on your ears.

    • Alto
      link
      fedilink
      108 months ago

      Youtube premium really only makes sense if you’re going to use youtube music as well, in which case its a decent value. At least here in the states, spotify is $11/month whereas youtube premium is $14/month.

      • @NightOwl@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 months ago

        I have hated the trend of companies bundling services to charge more instead of separating it.

        • Alto
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          Oh I’d much rather it be piecemeal with the option of bundling it, don’t get me wrong. It’s just a bit misleading to try to frame it as only ad free youtube

          • @NightOwl@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            When it comes to these forced bundles if the added service isn’t something I’d pay I just price it at what they are asking for, since whether it includes extra doesn’t matter when there isn’t a choice to separate it. It’s just an approach I’ve taken due to services like PS+ paywalling multiplayer while I didn’t care about the “free games”.

      • @krigo666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        I have absolutely no interest in music streaming services. I discover the music on Youtube, yes, but if I like the band enough I buy the download. Specially since my music tastes are non mainstream.

      • @Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        Better to donate that $11 or $14 / mo to uBlock Origin - that way you’re paying people who are actually providing a service to you. With YouTube (Google) you’re not the consumer, you’re the product.

      • @cole@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        even better deal if you’re still grandfathered into the $9.99/mo tier like I am. I know they said they would increase those prices… but so far not

    • Shake747
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      308 months ago

      Chrome is working hard to get that sweet internet explorer status

  • froggers
    link
    fedilink
    English
    238 months ago

    Still wondering how this will play out in the EU.

    • @krigo666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It might actually be illegal in the EU for them to run scripts to detect ad blockers without asking permission first.

      • froggers
        link
        fedilink
        English
        108 months ago

        Yeah, that’s why I’m really curious about how this will play out. I just hope that people will be the ones benefiting from this shitshow and not Youtube.

        • @0xD
          link
          English
          18 months ago

          YouTube is a for-profit service run by a company. If they can’t make it profitable due to low premium adoption or regulation there will be less freedom to post/view stuff on there. There will be no upside for users.

          Everyone should really reevaluate their stance on premium services and the value they get out of them. The time of free is over - even something like lemmy needs funding.

      • @Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        So then they’ll just embed them into the video, refuse to serve the video until the time is up, etc. Running clientside snooping scripts is only one way for them to enforce this. The idea that EU law will somehow force YouTube to just serving you content without ads is entirely copium.

        • @Moneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          88 months ago

          A black screen is infinitely less annoying than an ad. I don’t see google winning this battle.

          • @NightOwl@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            48 months ago

            Yep, been common for sports streams where you get a notification that game is on break or something and play will resume once game starts again. Preferable over ads to me.

          • @Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            OK? That’s still not Google “losing” some battle. The point was the legality of their current implementation isn’t going to change whether they give in and just serve you the content like the OP was claiming

        • @originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          So? Let them make those changes then. That’s additional complexity and effort. They absolutely scoped that implementation against the one they chose and chose not to do it. Forcing them to spend the effort is still meaningful.

          • @xkforce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            You really dont want them embedding ads into videos like that. There’d be no blocking them and no way to download them without the ads baked right into the video file.

            • @SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              38 months ago

              SponserBlock provides defenses against that with minor modifications.

              It’s been suggested that that would be an absolute last ditch effort because it trashes your ability to display targeted ads or update them without absolutely wrecking your CDNs. You also can’t have the ad link to anything because that would allow the client to trivially detect and skip it.

              Ad Nauseam also provides the nuclear option of downloading the ads, pretending to display them, and even pretending to click them. You might still have to wait out the delay for while the ad should be playing for the first ad, but once you get past that they can’t prevent the player skipping ads without also preventing you skipping 30s of boring content.

            • @Moneo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              38 months ago

              People will figure out a sponsorblock-esque crowdsourced ad detection that auto skips everything that isn’t part of the video.

    • @Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      uBlock contributors were pumping out filter updates like crazy these past few weeks. There was a constant tug of war as Google kept patching YouTube again every time they got adblock working again. Their tracker for YouTube issues has received something like a thousand comments since this all started.

  • @Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108 months ago

    I’m not going to watch 60 seconds of make-money-online scam ads just to watch some stupid cat video. They’re really overestimating the value of Youtube “content.” It’s mostly frivolous crap. If they cap it to an ad per hour or something maybe. But it’s out of control.

  • Ignacio
    link
    fedilink
    58 months ago

    My ad blocker works wonderfully. Meanwhile, I’m starting to contribute with content on Peertube. It’s something at least.

  • @Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28 months ago

    I’ve got 3 or 4 different ad blockers installed just to cover the gaps in when YouTube finds a way around uBlock Origin for a couple days.

    Still doing their job as of now. 🤞