• rekabis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    And this is just one of three reasons why I will never own a vehicle manufactured after 2006.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Everyone thinks they’re a great driver… but I know that even when I’m exhausted, I will signal 90% more turns than these clowns I’m forced to share the road with.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This technology will just prove what we already know. Most people shouldn’t be driving. Bring on the trains and buses!

  • Turret3857
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The federal government promises this surveillance saves 9,000-10,000 lives annually.

    Wikipedia says roughly 42k people died of car related injuries in 2022.

    So, the government is promising that this brand new technology that has not had any field testing whatsoever is going to reduce car related deaths by 23%?

    They’re lucky theres no way to sue over a broken promise.

    Here’s a great way to reduce car deaths to near 0%

    functional public transit.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not about reducing road fatalities.

      It’s about surveilling political enemies.

      It’ll have sudden false positives the moment you talk about how bad the government is. It’ll suddenly appear in counter-terrorism surveillance.

  • Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    3 days ago

    This keeps getting buried by the algos, but I see this requirement as a real problem. Unreliable tech that stops your car if it thinks you’re not driving right… and already current implementations have lots of false positive actions. Yeah, nope. This won’t go well.

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        And everyone behind who brakes to avoid accident instantly gets their premium increased, which they need to pay retroactively to get the payout for this incident.

  • JordanZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 days ago

    If the AI determines you’re impaired (blood alcohol ≥0.08% or showing fatigue), it can prevent ignition startup or limit vehicle speed.

    That should go well for my drives across -20F(-30C) degree areas. That first option could literally get someone killed at worst or cause some interesting problems at best. You’re tired and want to fill up before heading to the hotel? Now you’re stuck at the gas pump.

    False positives are going to be rampant. I remember the face tracking cameras that didn’t work at all for anybody that wasn’t Caucasian. I’d imagine there is going to be tons of lawsuits from accessibility groups when it misidentifies perfectly alert people due to some abnormality.

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m about to say something that can be read as me supporting this shit, and I do not.

        However.

        Driving fatigued is about as unsafe as driving drunk. Assuming you are actually fatigued.

        There was a time in the past when we allowed people to actively drink and drive.

        I think - for the most part - not allowing that was a good idea.

        IN THEORY preventing people from driving fatigued is not a bad idea.

        IN PRACTICE we all know it won’t be as simple as that.

        But the basic idea itself is… not all bad. It’s a pity we know it’ll go to shit.

        • fartographer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Fuck off with your nuanced take. We’re here to be irrational and fire off unwarranted gripes!

          I want my car to make hot coffee and pour it in my lap every morning on the way to work!

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well we’re going to have to figure out something for all the people who take a couple hours to get their brains into gear in the morning if you want to stop that.

          • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Yes indeed. I don’t think it’ll be easy at all. Trying to stop intoxicated driving is difficult enough, and that’s usually driving that happens “after hours”. So this would be ten times more difficult.

            I suppose, in theory, most of the time forcing the use of some sort of alternate transportation would work, although we’d have to figure out how to make it cheaper. We often drink close to where we live, and work far from where we live.

            If it was up to me, I’d delay this further and do more research and get more smart people coming up with ideas on how to solve these problems, because it would be worth trying to fix. But then again, there are so many problems we should be tackling, this is a relatively minor one…

    • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Now if this piece of regulation passes what’s preventing your government from allowing full blown rollout of ai based fines system using camera networks for example ? This crap lowers the bar in terms of human validation a whole lot.

  • Wimster@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ofcourse this would happen. Every EV car has a sort-kind-of-black-box and a gps. So every car knows exactely what speed it is allowed to drive on the roads. In the future - when you have an accident - the insurrance company can investigate the black box of your car and see immediately what speed you were driving on that particular gps-point. With your mobile phone connected to the car, it can also see immediately who was driving the car, etc… It was written in the stars many years ago.

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      My mom was using a tracker app to record her drives on her phone and when skiing. It recorded dozens of drives up and down the mountain.

      You can delete them or say it’s not you driving, but there were weeks of them and she easily could have missed some.

  • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    lol like when I rented a Penske truck that had lane departure that kept malfunctioning.

    Kept thinking I was on the road besides the freeway and slamming the brakes because I was over the speed limit.