Literally a used Switch game in a big, ridiculous bag with a “New” sticker on it. Imagine going into a GameStop with a game in a bag like this and convincing them to give you credit for it as “New”.

Don’t buy online from GameStop. Actually, just don’t buy from GameStop.

  • xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    And this is the company wallstreetbets wanted so bad to defend. It should have died. It DESERVED to die but Reddit wanted it alive because if there’s anything Reddit hates more, it is short sellers. But the reality is that most of the time the companies that get taken down by short selling aren’t healthy to begin with. After all, why push a strong company off the cliff when you can push a weak one that is overvalued?

    • Chozo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not that they wanted GameStop to win. They wanted Wall Street to lose.

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you are right, at the start they had noble intentions hidden behind a get rich quick scheme.

        But then they all became GME holders, they had a vested interest. So now they act like the shitty video game store in the mall is actually cool and innovative and soon some management changes and NFT nonsense will turn the company around.

        In some small way, they became what they sought to destroy.

        • Chozo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          So now they act like the shitty video game store in the mall is actually cool and innovative and soon some management changes and NFT nonsense will turn the company around.

          Outside of people clearly being facetious on WSB, I literally never see anybody genuinely have this attitude toward GameStop.

          • Krono@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If every pro-GameStop post on r/WSB and r/Superstonk was actually a joke then they have achieved levels of sarcasm far beyond what I thought possible.

            • phillaholic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              What starts out as a joke turns real as people who don’t understand it’s a joke join in.

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The act is very important in the event of an SEC investigation. Since I don’t hold stock in the company, I’m safe to say this, but basically if they wrote “Yeah, I don’t have any faith in the company itself, I just caught Wall Street tycoons making an insane short sell” then that comment could become a major exhibit in an exchange fraud case that makes them forfeit their shares.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think there was more to it than that. It seemed more like a situation where they could kill two birds with one stone. They could destroy, or at least severely damage the stock market by ensuring the hedgefunds couldn’t buy back the shorted stock, and even if they didn’t, they had the chance to become extremely wealthy while trying.

      It probably would have worked too if it weren’t for those meddling kids stock brokers like Robin Hood working with hedgefunds to claw back stocks and the SEC towering over them with potential charges of market manipulation.

      • RaineV1@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It never would have worked. The absolute best case scenario was one hedgefund company has less profit that year.

      • BargsimBoyz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Destroy or severely damage the stock market? It was just one stock, some people lost money but it didn’t affect 99%+ of the stock market or its traders… Just a little meme blip on the scale of things.

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Watching that all was a bit like watching a sped up version of the crypto boom.

      It started off with a bunch of well-meaning weirdos that were sticking it to the man. Then a few people made a whole bunch of money and from there it got super popular and turned into a weird libertarian cult.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        It got me interested in stocks. I blew a few bucks on their wacky schemes, but for the most part I put in some long term investments that are slowly climbing.