• infeeeee@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’s an article from 2025 July, if you follow the story it doesn’t contain new information

    • voodooattack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 days ago

      I read that back then and was wondering if there were any new developments. Looks like checking the comments always pays off.

  • scholar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    11 days ago

    This has been my favourite tech story for the past few years, I hope the train company gets put in its place properly this time.

    Edit: This article is from July last year.

  • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Newag […] is suing ethical hackers who exposed its anti-repair software, threatening independent repair and consumer rights.

    It sounds like the hackers are threatening the company with independent repair and consumer rights

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      ethical hackers

      Now all we need is for some unethical ones to hack them into bankruptcy.

  • worhui@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’s always great to see how the EU handles IP and large companies compared to the US.

    If the articles series of events and statements are true I wonder if the hackers will win. The company initiating the lock initially created a state where un-serviced trains locked up. It seems a straightforward case of bug fixing that is allowed in EU law.

  • IcePee@lemmy.beru.co
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 days ago

    Looking at the requested penalty makes me wonder why they didn’t request one trillion. I mean if you are being blatant about your ulterior motive to scare off further investigation into your unethical practices.

    Anyway they now got the stink on them. Any railway operator dealing with them will have no one but themselves to blame going forward.

      • IcePee@lemmy.beru.co
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Even if this is true, and I make no comment on that, you may very well be correct. Without further laws/treaties bidding ≠ selecting. I assume one of the criteria is the company’s fitness.

        The train operators should recognise that they are in a bit of a monopsony, here.