For the last few years, one of the coolest bits of e-bike tech I’ve seen didn’t involve more power, bigger…

  • markstos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    12 days ago

    But it’s inefficient. In the 1 hour you are shopping, it’s going to charge far less than a physical connection and in terms of environment impact, you are wasting energy compared to taking 30 seconds to plug in a bike. Then there’s the issue that no bikes support this but several use compatible charging interfaces. I don’t expect this to go anywhere any time soon.

    • Wolf314159@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Plugs, connectors, and cables often break, corrode, get vandalized, etc. The physical connections on most of the electronic devices I’ve owned have been the first thing to fail. The wireless connections and wireless charging has NEVER been something that I’ve ever had to worry about physically breaking. I’d wage that infrastructure maintenance is going to cost much more in the long run than the cost of inefficiency introduced by wireless charging.

      • markstos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        There’s some truth to that. I’ve had some USB ports fail on phones that were quite a pain to fix or not really fixable at all.

        Wireless charging of a phone avoids degrading the USB port through more use. The difference with a phone is that the absolute amount of inefficiency is so much smaller because a phone battery is so much smaller than a bike.