Police in U.S. say technology is helpful but researchers say Canada should hesitate before using it

  • jsdz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wonder how disastrously bad things will need to get before it finally breaks through into public consciousness that maybe putting surveillance cameras everywhere was a bad idea. I expect we’ll find out in a couple of decades.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t really the issue.

      The real issue is that people have become so soft, so INCREDIBLY dependant on convenience, that they have given up all control. Having autonomy/privacy/ownership over your own environment is just too much work. It’s easier to just let someone else handle the surveillance system for you. What could go wrong?

      This issue of complacency plagues just about everything, from cloud computing and banking to transportation and housing.

      • 1847953620@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        wall-e except it’ll be even more dystopian and the robot love story will instead be a deathmatch between rival corporation robo-wardogs

    • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m really unsure of how this will play out. Gen Z seems to be way more okay with stuff like this and I think it’s just a general mindset shift that I don’t really see changing. Gen Z tends to constantly share their location with every acquaintance, on snapchat, etc all the time.

      As much as stuff like this freaks me out and seems many steps too far, younger generations don’t, so I feel this is going to get worse over time, not better.

  • Butterbee (She/Her)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I have cameras… I really don’t mind supplying the footage if police ask. But I really would like that they ask. And I REALLY don’t want them to have footage that they don’t ask for and don’t obtain a warrant for.

  • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Police in U.S. say technology is helpful[…]”

    The same police in the US who need military grade APCs for reasons unknowable to the universe?

    • Lee Duna@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The same police in the US who need military grade APCs for reasons unknowable to the universe?

      It was useful in Nakatomi Plaza siege, oh wait…

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yep, it’s intended to be opt in from the article

      Police let people know which cameras might be useful or people can try to sign up on their own

      • webhead@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is why I refuse to own Ring cameras. Any company that has a program at all to share with the police is a nope from me. I don’t care if they say it’s opt in, it won’t be.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    (tldr: 5 sentences skipped)

    Some of those in attendance saw a demo of Fusus — a paid service that makes it easier for police to access privately owned security camera footage from residents and businesses.

    (tldr: 12 sentences skipped)

    The cameras, Barth said, are a “time-saver” for lower-priority calls like property crimes and make it easy for police to give video to lawyers requesting footage of car crashes.

    (tldr: 6 sentences skipped)

    She points to Clearview AI, a controversial facial recognition tool Canadian police services secretly used until privacy watchdogs ordered them to stop.

    Tusikov said Fusus would be a “disproportionate response” to crimes like auto theft, which has been surging in Canada, and likely wouldn’t help with intimate partner violence, which has been declared an epidemic in Hamilton and other cities across the country.

    (tldr: 17 sentences skipped)

    CBC contacted Canadian police services at the Real Time Crime Center Operations and Tech Integration conference, asking if any of them use Fusus or are exploring using it or similar technology.

    (tldr: 9 sentences skipped)

    “We would especially encourage this given that Fusus appears to involve real-time monitoring and unmediated access to private surveillance cameras which may come with a greater risk of intrusion into the privacy of individuals,” the IPC said.


    The original article contains 1,187 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 82%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • BZzzz@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    i’m tech and my cam password is 123456. no, i joke, i have leave blank my password.