Very entertaining. I’m totally lost around 1400. I don’t even recognize 1200 as English lol.

  • lath@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 days ago

    From 1400 and back, it’s more phonetic. Less differentiation between how it sounds and how it’s written, plus the accent shifts.
    I feel an old Scots(wo)man might be more at ease with it, if read aloud. As both their words and this seems like the same kind of gibberish to me.

    • Zombie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Fit? We dinna spik gibberish! It’s thon Sassenachs that makkit the book wi’ spellings that mak yi feel like yir heid is mince!

      Tap for spoiler

      What? We don’t speak gibberish! It’s those English that made the book (ie dictionary) with spellings that make you feel your head is mince(d beef).

  • 0ops@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    I was doing pretty well (albeit really slow and deliberate) through 1300, 1200 I was able to make out a few lines, but the rest is gibberish to me.

    Edit: I had another wack at it and was able to pick out a little bit of 1100, still no luck on 1000

    • cenzorrll@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Same here, 1300 was a slog, but I got through it. 1200 was like trying to read German, I got a few phrases here and there but that’s it.

      • LordMayor@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        That’s exactly what’s happening. If you read the author’s explanation, around 1250 is when English starts picking the up the Latin and French loan words that modern English speakers are used to.

        English is a Germanic language. So, without the loan words, it is very much more like German.

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    Only after languages were institutionalized and formal education became more common, that the languages sort of stabilized and the rate of change became slower. Back then, languages were more “freestyle” and people sometimes didn’t even properly understand each other

  • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    I was able to read every sentence in the 1300 section with difficultly, occasionally getting stumped by individual words.

    I could figure out the basic events of the 1200 section, but missed some specific details - I didn’t realize that the person who saves the blogger is a woman, for example.

    1100 was beyond me, or at least beyond the effort I was willing to put into it.

  • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 days ago

    Shakespeare is modern English. Even that is challenging for most people. Beyond that it’s not longer the English we think of (with the heavy French influence).

  • scops@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Is it some kind of social commentary that the writer seems progressively more superstitious and easily frightened as the centuries roll back?

    Dude talks about a walk back to his B&B like he’s a Hobbit dodging nazguls

    • CombatWombat@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yep! For instance, the author discusses the changes from a blog post to a letter from 2000 - 1800. As they move back in time, both the language and also the themes and form change to match the style of literature and culture of the time.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      I mean he has a right to be suspicious

      !the story seems to be about a werewolfs goons capturing him and sentencing him to death until he’s saved by Ælfgifu gehaten!<

  • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’ve been a Rob Words channel fiend lately, about the same as you OP. I suspect if I was teleported back in time earlier than 1400 that I could learn quicker than someone who has never learned any form of English to a point, but it’d still be quite the effort. Then again I’m only considering listening and reading. I think learning to speak well enough to be understood in return is probably harder still, possibly worse than blank slate?

  • Dragonborn3810@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    1200 was where I got lost. Ive been reading through 1600s documents recently for my history coursework so ive got a bit of practice!

  • Quilotoa@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    I think it would be more of a gradient than a cutoff. Unless you have a more specific definition for “understand.”

  • ErevanDB@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    I got to abt 1200, but looking furðer, it feels like i should be able to read it, I just lack knowledge of ðe sounds produced by ðose letters.